Dating violence among college men and women
Acceptability of violence, or acceptability of partner's rationalizations for violence, can determine how likely a victim is to seek formal or informal intervention or to terminate the relationship (Miller & Simpson, 1991).This data highlights a critical need for scientific understanding of how relationship status (often indicative of the level of relationship intimacy/seriousness) affects individual attitudes toward violence as it is well established that acceptance of violence strongly predicts future abuse and victimization (Falchikov, 1996; Lichter & Mc Closkey, 2004; Riggs & O'Leary, 1996; Slep, Cascardi, Avery-Leaf, & O'Leary, 2001).Dating violence is always wrong, and you can get help.Dating violence includes: Dating violence often starts with emotional abuse.Attitudes about gender roles and alcohol, number of consensual sex partners, how well the S knew the female, how isolated the setting was, alcohol consumption during the event, the S's misperception of the female's cues during the event, and prior consensual sexual activity between the male and the female discriminated between sexual assaults and worst dates. "Gender role attitudes, religion, and spirituality as predictors of domestic violence attitudes in white college students." Journal of College Student Development 45(2): 119-133.Additionally, tactics used to obtain sex, self-attributions, the perceived seriousness of the assault, and the extent to which it disrupted relationships with others significantly discriminated between Ss who committed forced sexual contact, sexual coercion, and rape. In this study we investigated gender role attitudes, religion, and spirituality as predictors of beliefs about violence against women in a sample of 316 White college students.Dating violence is when one person purposely hurts or scares someone they are dating.Dating violence happens to people of all races, cultures, incomes, and education levels.
Results show that a third of Ss reported they had perpetrated some form of sexual assault.
Implications and intervention strategies to address dating violence among college students are discussed. Reviews literature since 1980 on college men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and other forms of sexual assault. As expected, several environmental characteristics (e.g., young patrons, pool playing) and social behaviors (e.g., alcohol consumption, leaving the bar with strangers) were associated with more severe bar-related aggression experienced by women during the past year These results shed light on the significant problem of bar-related aggression against women and can potentially be used to develop prevention and educational programs. Although many research studies have utilized routine activities theory to predict sexual assault using individual-level factors, little is known about the effect of school-level factors on a student's risk of sexual assault.
Topics include (1) the definition and incidence of acquaintance rape and sexual assault, (2) perpetrator characteristics, (3) situations associated with sexual assault, and (4) men's misperception of women's sexual intent. Based on interviews from 3,036 randomly selected students and surveys from 11 randomly selected colleges in the United States, a hierarchical linear model was created to predict student victimizations by school characteristics.
The survey found that: - 2.1% of male students and 7.5% of female students reported experiencing sexual touching without their consent.
- 0.6% of male students and 3.5% of female students reported experiencing attempted sexual penetration without their consent.